He generalizes about Liberals and it prompted
Moshellies response below:
Moshellie
Michelle J.
Yes, because all liberals are Eeeevil COMMIE baby eaters.
You generalize to an extreme. Just as not all conservatives are the same, neither are liberals. In fact, a GOOD number of those you'd peg as liberal would surprise you with the conservative stances they take (like myself, whom you've inferred was one of those "liberals" you are demonizing).
You seem very bitter and resentful toward those who don't align with your every thought... kinda' sad.
Posted by Moshellie on November 19, 2009 - Thursday - 1:07 PM You generalize to an extreme. Just as not all conservatives are the same, neither are liberals. In fact, a GOOD number of those you'd peg as liberal would surprise you with the conservative stances they take (like myself, whom you've inferred was one of those "liberals" you are demonizing).
You seem very bitter and resentful toward those who don't align with your every thought... kinda' sad.
MTRG's comments to Saraii, and then think how he should be proof that he hasn't
learned anything about how to treat women or debate.
Saraii
Please note that I do not use an avatar and my profile has been around for ages, I'm hardly a fake profile. I'm curious to know what you will label me, as I'm clearly not ugly even though I am a "liberal" female.
You act so high and mighty, as if you are above everybody else. You are the cause of all your own problems. You belittle people for being old and fat, pot meet kettle! You claim to make all these conquests in clubs and bars with younger women..where are they? They exist only in your little delusional brain!
You say you are skeptical for using myspace for true debate..you wouldn't know true debate if it bit you on your fat ass. You post pictures of ugly liberal women and call everybody who does not agree with you a troll or ugly. Show me one instance where you have engaged in a fair or true argument?
This is just pathetic..
Posted by Saraii on November 18, 2009 - Wednesday - 4:20 PM You act so high and mighty, as if you are above everybody else. You are the cause of all your own problems. You belittle people for being old and fat, pot meet kettle! You claim to make all these conquests in clubs and bars with younger women..where are they? They exist only in your little delusional brain!
You say you are skeptical for using myspace for true debate..you wouldn't know true debate if it bit you on your fat ass. You post pictures of ugly liberal women and call everybody who does not agree with you a troll or ugly. Show me one instance where you have engaged in a fair or true argument?
This is just pathetic..
Michael, the Rochester Rogue!
Michael Rochester
Sweetypie, you "fucking hate George Bush." I don't hate Obama. You hating someone you don't know, speaks volumes of your character and ethics. Disagreeing with a president's politics is one thing. "Hating" a president of the United States based on the fact he was conservative was ignorant, and intellectually obtuse of you.
As for separation of church and state, you already, in your own way, admitted there was no such wording in the constitution and had to be interpreted as such by liberal assclowns such as the morons on the Warren and Burger SCOTUS terms. Actually, the entire separation of church and state idea can be actully traced back to 1947 Everson decision which created phony guidelines for taking religion out of public schools.
That decision, by a liberal heavy SCOTUS (which had among its members only one real conservative, William Rehnquist), put religious freedom and diversity on a collision course with the welfare-regulatory state. If the public sphere, must be secular, then an expanding public sphere implies a shrinking sphere for religion and religious diversity. Why was the Lemon decision bad? Here is the link as to why. Then there was a 1997 decision which questioned the entire Lemon decision. The court actually sided with public school teachers who wanted to teach in parochial schools. That is why when judicial activism is taken out of the courts via justices like Scalia and Thomas, it will work against godless assholes such as yourself.
Posted by Michael, the Rochester Rogue! on November 19, 2009 - Thursday - 3:34 PM As for separation of church and state, you already, in your own way, admitted there was no such wording in the constitution and had to be interpreted as such by liberal assclowns such as the morons on the Warren and Burger SCOTUS terms. Actually, the entire separation of church and state idea can be actully traced back to 1947 Everson decision which created phony guidelines for taking religion out of public schools.
That decision, by a liberal heavy SCOTUS (which had among its members only one real conservative, William Rehnquist), put religious freedom and diversity on a collision course with the welfare-regulatory state. If the public sphere, must be secular, then an expanding public sphere implies a shrinking sphere for religion and religious diversity. Why was the Lemon decision bad? Here is the link as to why. Then there was a 1997 decision which questioned the entire Lemon decision. The court actually sided with public school teachers who wanted to teach in parochial schools. That is why when judicial activism is taken out of the courts via justices like Scalia and Thomas, it will work against godless assholes such as yourself.
Saraii
Godless asshole??
Not very Christian of you, is it?? I have never stated that I was an atheist, just that I was not a Christian.
Disagreeing with somebody like you is pointless, you will continue to throw stones and resort to name calling. Enjoy your feelings of superiority. This godless asshole thinks you should be ashamed of your continually disgusting behavior...
Posted by Saraii on November 19, 2009 - Thursday - 4:02 PM Not very Christian of you, is it?? I have never stated that I was an atheist, just that I was not a Christian.
Disagreeing with somebody like you is pointless, you will continue to throw stones and resort to name calling. Enjoy your feelings of superiority. This godless asshole thinks you should be ashamed of your continually disgusting behavior...
Michael, the Rochester Rogue!
Michael Rochester
Saraii, I don't represent all Christians, the same way YOU don't represent ALL assholes, you got it?
Resort to namecalling? Your very first blog comment was replete with namecalling and insults. Are you that stupid, or are you like most women who come to my blog, to pretend to argue with me, but actually are turned on by me and want to sleep with me?
I am willing to forgive the ad hominems and let bygones be bygones if we slap some skin together and moan together in liberal conservative ying yang ecstacy.
Posted by Michael, the Rochester Rogue! on November 19, 2009 - Thursday - 4:05 PM Resort to namecalling? Your very first blog comment was replete with namecalling and insults. Are you that stupid, or are you like most women who come to my blog, to pretend to argue with me, but actually are turned on by me and want to sleep with me?
I am willing to forgive the ad hominems and let bygones be bygones if we slap some skin together and moan together in liberal conservative ying yang ecstacy.
| | Michael, the Rochester Rogue! Michael Rochester |
|
If I do not merit a response, why have you responded to me multiple times? You won't be rude, but have the audacity to tell me that I need a spanking?
Thanks for the psychobabble bullshit, where'd you get your degree from? Do you just arbitrarily decide that everybody that has an opposing viewpoint is in need to medication?
And no, I am never content. I always strive to better myself and set new goals. Clearly this makes me anti-social. What was I thinking?? I should become fat and complacent and agree with the ideas that you would force feed me.
Thank you for showing me what a sham my life is! Yes I am nearly 30 and all it took was the comments of a rank obsessed blogger to show me the error of my ways!
And the idea of you hitting it makes me want to vomit..
Posted by Saraii on November 19, 2009 - Thursday - 2:41 PM Thanks for the psychobabble bullshit, where'd you get your degree from? Do you just arbitrarily decide that everybody that has an opposing viewpoint is in need to medication?
And no, I am never content. I always strive to better myself and set new goals. Clearly this makes me anti-social. What was I thinking?? I should become fat and complacent and agree with the ideas that you would force feed me.
Thank you for showing me what a sham my life is! Yes I am nearly 30 and all it took was the comments of a rank obsessed blogger to show me the error of my ways!
And the idea of you hitting it makes me want to vomit..
Michael, the Rochester Rogue!
Michael Rochester
I responded because you are someone who needs to be schooled, due to your frequently inept comments regarding politics and current events. That is why, petunia. Psychobabble? This is the Queen's English, sweetheart....are you lacking in a thesaurus if these words are too difficult for you to comprehend?
There is a difference between being compacent and wanting to be challenged...and never being satisfied. When you are unsatisfied, you will never know when you reached a goal or completed a task successfully. It is okay to make larger goals, but to think any move up the ladder is still staying put, is a sad parable of your own life. I think if you want to get fat, you may not always just be that way because of eating and non exercise. Hormones, thyroid problems and bad mirrors should also do the trick.
And since you are done vomiting, do you take it doggy style or missionary?
Posted by Michael, the Rochester Rogue! on November 19, 2009 - Thursday - 2:59 PM There is a difference between being compacent and wanting to be challenged...and never being satisfied. When you are unsatisfied, you will never know when you reached a goal or completed a task successfully. It is okay to make larger goals, but to think any move up the ladder is still staying put, is a sad parable of your own life. I think if you want to get fat, you may not always just be that way because of eating and non exercise. Hormones, thyroid problems and bad mirrors should also do the trick.
And since you are done vomiting, do you take it doggy style or missionary?
| ichael, the Rochester Rogue! Michael Rochester |
|
........................
Michael, the Rochester Rogue!
....
Michael Rochester....
....
| Great blog. I notice most of the liberals on MySpace are atheists. Posted by Michael, the Rochester Rogue! on Friday, November 13, 2009 - 8:26 PM .... |
Michael, you are a PIG!!
You not only try to date rape, but you also try to cyber rape, you are DISGUSTING!!!
Ok, you can be a slimy lizard instead:
No comments:
Post a Comment