comments page 3 from Jims blog

World B Free!

Oh dear. Poor Sabby. As much as she is still young and a little unworldly, she would be far more respectable if she stopped wailing about liberals all the time and tried to present balanced blogs. Have you noticed that other than Helz and Zeus both of whom I respect a lot, most of the deep thinking conservatives rarely contribute to her blog. I wish she would simply say what she has to say and let people debate it out without calling anyone who opposes her silly or a drone or an idiot. She would actually gain some semblance of respect if she did it that way.   Posted by World B Free! on December 18, 2009 - Friday - 11:45 AM [Reply to this]

	jim	I could be much more understanding of that. I wouldn't necessarily agree with her, but I could respect her views anyways.   Posted by jim on December 18, 2009 - Friday - 12:01 PM [Reply to this]

	Pelauria Princess Pellie	I've been thinking about this whole global warming thing, cap and trade, blah blah etc. etc. Would a raging, radical conservative take a big dump in her kitchen and just leave it there?  I mean if she risked being called a dreaded "humanitarian" by NOT shitting there in the first place?  Regardless of whether or not global warming is real, pollution is real.  This is our planet. Get real.   Posted by Pelauria on December 18, 2009 - Friday - 3:06 PM [Reply to this]

	World B Free!	Would a raging, radical conservative take a big dump in her kitchen and just leave it there?  I mean if she risked being called a dreaded "humanitarian" by NOT shitting there in the first place? LOL !!   Posted by World B Free! on December 19, 2009 - Saturday - 1:07 AM [Reply to this]

	Pelauria Princess Pellie	And no, I didn't read her blog past the first sentence.  If I wanted to hear Faux News, I'd turn it on, not have it regurgitated, thank you very much.   Posted by Pelauria on December 18, 2009 - Friday - 3:08 PM [Reply to this]

	jim	It did sound a bit Glenn Beckish. Considering her copy-n-paste nature, I wouldn't be surprised if she printed the transcript from the show and that's what is listed above. The only thing that makes me think she probably wrote that drivel herself is the adamant stand she has taken against Humanitarians. Dumb.As.Rocks. Which is probably an insult to rocks, to be honest   Posted by jim on December 18, 2009 - Friday - 4:14 PM [Reply to this]

	The vacationing mind	This is certainly what is wrong with people in general. It is much easier to see a trait you like in say Bill O, or Rush. The seeming straight forward take no guff loud posturing, is something young people seem to relate well to. What they do not understand is that just because someone is loud, and in your face does not make them right. If they were taught how to study, instead of how to learn according to public school standards, we would see much less of this sort of silly stupidity. That is just my 2 cents. Public schools teach children to conform to the business world. They should teach them how to research an intelligent opinion.   Posted by The vacationing mind on December 18, 2009 - Friday - 6:02 PM [Reply to this]

	jim	You're absolutely right. Kids need to be taught to research, think more. Public schools spend so much time teaching kids to just memorize the necessary details and forget the rest. So, they hear a few catchy phrases on the news and memorize them. No messy thinking that way. Just memorize the basics   Posted by jim on December 18, 2009 - Friday - 6:42 PM [Reply to this]

	B	I have never commented on one of her blogs and never plan on it.  I have read a few, simply for the fact that they are ALWAYS (auto refresher anyone?) in the top 10, even with 12 comments.  Anywho...it's simple to deduce the fact that she doesn't know anything at the ripe old age of 20.  A person can cut and paste all they want (though they should give credit where credit is due), however in the comments she clearly doesn't even understand the context of her cut and paste.  However, a lot of people have been giving her and her hubby a great deal of attention lately, which only serves to encourage them unfortunately.  I'm surprised anyone takes her seriously or tries to engage in any form of conversation with her at all. One day she will grow up and hopefully be extremely embarrassed at what she has blogged about.  I at least hope she comes to that realization at some point in life.  It's usually through the harsh realities of the world that someday she will fall into outside this little box.  Look, until she can get herself away from the mirror of self admiration she isn't going to learn shit from any of us liberals.    Posted by B on December 18, 2009 - Friday - 6:12 PM [Reply to this]

	jim	You're exactly right about everything you wrote. As for the auto-refresher, I don't think it's even a question aymore of whether she uses a auto-refresher. I think the real question is which one does she use? Because it works well.   Posted by jim on December 18, 2009 - Friday - 6:44 PM [Reply to this]

	espen	100 000 was said to have demonstrated peacefule ,but a few hundred but heads get all the atention by the press. The police did trapp and arrest ca 900 ,99% of them hadnt done nothing wrong but had to spend hours in prison. The police stratgie was clearly to provoke,and clearly there are a few hundreds that likes to fight the police no doubot about that. I would have liked to see your tea baggers bee treated the same way by police,prevantiv policing (you might think about doing somthing wrong so we just arrest you )   Posted by espen on December 18, 2009 - Friday - 8:54 PM [Reply to this]

	jim	I would have liked to see your tea baggers That's for Sabrina, right? Cause I'm not a teabagger. Just wanted to clarify.lol   Posted by jim on December 18, 2009 - Friday - 11:45 PM [Reply to this]

	espen	Of  cours i did mean you. Cant back down even if i did write in some errors,and lost the logic in my comment You rude teabagger , Never go back on anything even if wrong,i gone start the name calling,since i no cant make any logic defenc of my position.  (dont say i havent learn somthing reading Phili blogs)   Posted by espen on December 19, 2009 - Saturday - 7:41 AM [Reply to this]

	Big John	And too think they have a child. Another generation of vile hate refucktard in the making. What a fucked up world we live in. I have read tidbits of both of their blogs and never again.   Posted by Big John on December 18, 2009 - Friday - 10:48 PM [Reply to this]

	jim	With any luck there child will grow up to be a prominent Liberal, as a rebellion towards Mom and Dad. That's what happened for my adamantly Conservative parents. They got stuck with a loud, outspoken Liberal son. Aw, Kharma is a beaut   Posted by jim on December 18, 2009 - Friday - 11:46 PM [Reply to this]

	jim	there-their   Posted by jim on December 18, 2009 - Friday - 11:47 PM [Reply to this]

	The Duke	What an idiot.   Posted by The Duke on December 19, 2009 - Saturday - 1:43 AM [Reply to this]

	The Duke	Not you. lol! The idiot that thinks that global warming isnt man made.   Posted by The Duke on December 19, 2009 - Saturday - 1:46 AM [Reply to this]

	jim	lol. Yeah, she's a real gem. Not only is she not a big fan of Global Warming, but she thinks of Liberals as Evil Humanitarians. What a backwards concept, huh? I've met both Conservative and Liberal Humanitarians, but I've never met any evil Humanitarians   Posted by jim on December 19, 2009 - Saturday - 2:15 AM [Reply to this]

	J	Bah humbug! lol   Posted by J on December 19, 2009 - Saturday - 6:12 PM [Reply to this]

	jim	lol  That's the spirit   Posted by jim on December 21, 2009 - Monday - 7:42 AM [Reply to this]

	relbbircs	keep busting her....   Posted by relbbircs on December 20, 2009 - Sunday - 12:13 PM [Reply to this]

	jim	she makes it way too easy   Posted by jim on December 20, 2009 - Sunday - 6:01 PM [Reply to this]

	Moonster richard mooney	I'm barred from commenting Jim, otherwise I would have questioned her statement that man made Climate Change has been proven to be non existent.. How do you prove something doesn't exist....  ?? Just a thought... Can you turn the snow Off Now,, it suggesting that climate change is going backwards.... or is that the weather,, I couldn't undertsand a word of your blog... am I republican Biased now???   Posted by Moonster on December 21, 2009 - Monday - 6:48 AM [Reply to this]

	jim	I think it's set to require approval for comments. The snow is staying until after Christmas. It helps combat global warming.lol I didn't understand half of my own blog either, but that's because Sabrina wrote the half I didn't get.   Posted by jim on December 21, 2009 - Monday - 7:45 AM [Reply to this]

	Bizarro	I started reading her blogs because even though I'm a moderate, I lean more liberal in my political views and I like to get info from all sides and she was consistently in the top ten. I recently decided to stop wasting my time. I thought at first that her blog was representative of conservative views, and it is kind of, but in recent reading I have come to realize her views border on fanatacism. The comments are actually more telling than the blogs, which are idiosyncratic to the point where half the time she doesn't even understand her own arguements (quoting Einstein "I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones." in a blog supporting nuclear armament, comparing the war in Iraq to WWII: not because we were attacked in both instances but saying that the attack on Iraq was justified, you get the idea...). She posts catchy phrases to support her views. Worse, she cuts and pastes articles without giving credit and then throws a little opinion in to make it "original". Lately I've come to realize that her view that everything mainstream is liberal isn't politically driven at all, she is mad that society as a whole has moved away from her limited moral views. And like most religious types, she hates (not sure if that's the right word) the world and society for what it isn't instead of embracing it for what it is. <<.. Anyway, she hardly presents any facts and blasts anyone who puts forth facts she doesn't agree with as being "drones" of the liberal mainstream, thinking that dismissal is an adequate counter arguement. When that doesn't work she resorts to name-calling. The rare occasion when she does post any fact, her sources are conservative media and statistics provided by conservative research groups (Heritage Foundation). They wouldn't be biased at all, would they? She blasts everyone who disagrees with her as being a drone but isn't that a key to the drone making formula, the assumption everyone else is wrong and the only truth comes from a select few sources. And then of course you have the conditioning not to question your belief system no matter what the evidence, because once there is doubt the thinly built house of cards collapses. There are still commentors on her blog who think there were WMD's in Iraq and that Iraq supported Al Queida... Even Bush has been admitting that's not the case since 2005!?!? Nobody wanted to prove it more than him. The ignorance of her supporters is an excellent example of how far from the truth you can stray when you value your personal beliefs and moral standards above any factual evidence and you refuse to consider any alternative.   Posted by Bizarro on December 22, 2009 - Tuesday - 12:46 AM [Reply to this]

	jim	Yeah, her blogs really aren't worth the loss in brain cells. This title of hers just caught me off guard and I had to read it. I mean, who could possibly have a problem with humanitarians??  Obviously, not only does she, but she doesn't even know the difference between Humanitarian and Environmentalist. I mean, seriously?? So, anything you tell me about how dumb she is or the people who read her blogs regularly would come as no surprise to me. Sadly, for those over-religious types 'Hate' IS the appropriate word. They hate, hate, hate, all in the name of love. It's way too backwards for me. As for the WMD thing, you know what they're doing??  It's called revisioning history. You rewrite history by choosing to remember it how you want. It builds a good stable foundation so one day they can proclaim that Bush was a much better President than he was, because they've been telling the story of his presidency the way they want it remembered until finally the public agrees. They did the same with Reagan. He was no saint, that's for sure, but Conservatives have revisioned him into a God among Conservatives.   Posted by jim on December 22, 2009 - Tuesday - 8:34 AM [Reply to this]

	Bizarro	<<.."Nietchze"   Posted by Bizarro on December 22, 2009 - Tuesday - 12:48 AM [Reply to this]

	relbbircs	"A recent USA Today/Gallup Poll showed that 55% to 38% of Americans surveyed support the idea of a global treaty that would require the United States to reduce gas emissions tied to "global warming." What does this tell us?" It tells me that 45 to 62% are as dumb as Sabby Well, we have a lot of morons living amongst us who like to mask themselves as self-proclaimed "humanitarians." These same people, the "humanitarians," look at me as though I am some evil woman who hates the planet and wants to see it polluted and dirty....which is a false accusation. See, the difference between me and one of these "humanitarians" is that I don't like to invest my time, money and effort into something that is proven to be a nonexistent issue. Wow... Okay... if she doesn't really want a polluted planet, why is she opposed to legislation limiting pollution? I don't see her as "evil" I see her as slutty, ignorant, and wrong... but I am evil... and I don't not claim her as my own.... Proven non issue? The ice caps are melting, rain and weather patterns shifting, entire Eco systems threatened... but this is hardly an issue she'll waste her time... but by gods any fake profile mocking her is a real issue worth devoting her time to? No, man does NOT affect the climate. Yes, there is "climate change" it's called the weather. So at this little clown festival that has been going on over in Copenhagen about 968 protesters were detained by local police. What were they fighting for? IMMEDIATE ACTION FOR MAN-MADE GLOBAL WARMING. So these tens of thousands of freaks were singing, chanting and protesting all in the name of "man-made global" warming. Now you would think that this would be a group of peace-loving hippies and that violence would NEVER come into play with this group fighting for such a noble cause.....well, the demonstration turned very ugly when a bunch of "humanitarians" started throwing cobblestones and smashing windows. She already got schooled about weather versus climate... lets read this statement as a whole... 900 plus folks were arrested out of tens of thousands? Wow that makes the entire group bad? It is a proven historical fact that everyone from government to special interests will salt a crowd with trouble makers to discredit the entire group... Assuming however that she gets esp signals from her training bra.. and knows indeed that the people starting the riot indeed considered themselves humanitarians; it only serves to prove that other causes have people who are as big a hypocrite as she and her hubby are to the Christian faith... Am I the only one shaking my head right about now... Missing the question mark... but I digress no Sabby I am shaking my head at your blatant stupidity..... what is up with these people? One of the things that bothers me the most in this issue is that most of these creeps who ended up being detained were young! What went wrong with my generation? It seems like every time I have a conversation with anyone close to my age it's like I'm talking to a zombie, a drone. It's so upsetting for me to see how the liberal mentality has infected my generation like a plague. What is up with these people? For starters they are brain washed friggin' idiots parroting whatever stupid crap they read on lunatic web sites.... they aren't indoctrinated by Fox,  or poisoned by clear channel... I bet they'd laugh their young asses off if you told them you blog politics in your undies on MySpace... just sayin' Where am I going with this Oh Oh Oh... I know this was a very lame attempt to slam another blogger.? I believe that we all need to be cautious about all of these people who claim to be working for the common good of humanity....remember Karl Marx tried to claim the same thing. I have heard some of the nastiest, meanest things come out of the mouths of supposed "humanitarians". I find it seriously hard to believe that people like that are working toward creating a healthy and stable environment for everyone. Be on guard and don't ever let anyone try to put you down for not being in on scam "issues" like "global warming." We also should be cautious about fake Christians.. I digress that was an easy shot... I doubt Sabby has read Marx, we've never seen true Marxism, yet the right continues to wag his name like a scolding finger, proving not only their willingness to parrot... but their inability to read... for true meanness I turn towards phony Christians especially on MySpace.... just sayin' ... "Don't let anyone put you down" bwahaha... no in her mind only the right wing has that luxury... as the entire blog in question is in and of it's self a put down.... YOU pay your taxes to fund these outrageous organizations that help these liberals push their ideas on us, that's very "humanitarian" of you. Now if you'll excuse me, I just bought Saul Alinsky's 'Rules for Radicals' and I believe I have some very serious reading to do if I want to understand more about the power hungry libs who are trying to take over. Excuse me? tax money funds these groups... I demand proof... find the bill funding these lib organizations! And I doubt she read Rules for Radicals... the fucking do not remove tag on her over used mattress is beyond her comprehension level... She left high school, got hitched and worked as a cashier... citing, or recommending books beyond either your level, or the level of your collective readership as a whole simply because it is quoted by pundits is beyond asinine... I grade this blog of hers "F" no "S-F" SUPER FAIL!   Posted by relbbircs on December 22, 2009 - Tuesday - 3:12 AM [Reply to this]

	jim	Agreed. Super Fail   Posted by jim on December 22, 2009 - Tuesday - 8:44 AM [Reply to this]

	espen	It  must have been the bishops and church peaplo from the luteran churces who was in the protest shes talking about..wild crowd that i can imaged .   Posted by espen on December 22, 2009 - Tuesday - 7:31 PM [Reply to this]

	jim	Posted by jim on December 22, 2009 - Tuesday - 7:38 PM [Reply to this]

	Stratus Blue	I think she actually wrote that one or at least paraphrased the most vague parts. USA Today or Gallup? 38% or 55%. I doubt Rush would be that vague. He has editors. Before we divide the USA into another false opposite paradigm can we agree that climate catastrophe has occurred by other than human activity in both the distant and recent past? Can we agree that former "ice ages" were not due to human activity? Can we agree that the sun is volatile? Can we agree that sea level has changed dramatically throughout history? Do volcanoes put carbon into air? Is carbon dating techniques vulnerable to volcanism? Did human activity create craters on the moon? I guess what I am trying to say is, do solar eclipses really prove the sun is demanding human sacrifice? Who shall be sacrificed and what will that sacrifice do to alter the passions of the sun, the stars, the Earth's volcanism and the flux of time itself. Can we create stability by altering production habits via focused taxation? WHY is the ICC and UN interested in "saving us" when they simultaneously compose all the world's foremost genocidal maniacs?   Posted by Stratus Blue on December 23, 2009 - Wednesday - 3:53 PM [Reply to this]

jim

Sure, we can agree on those things? As long as we can agree that man HAS had an impact on the planet, one which has caused a speed-up of the natural processes that are already in place. See, this excuse that the planet has always been doing this, with or without humans is just more Conservative propaganda. It's what the "Progressive" Conservatives here in Texas have been teaching for awhile. It's just another way of going around the whole "man is impacting his planet" argument. I think the  truth lies in the middle. Yes, the planet has been shifting, cooling, then heating, then cooling again, for millions of years before humans came along. However, it's well documented that there has been a change in how fast the planet has changed since the industrial revolution. To suggest otherwise is just feeding propaganda.   Posted by jim on December 23, 2009 - Wednesday - 6:30 PM [Reply to this]