Current mood:
accomplished Category: News and Politics
The above was the final tally for my poll about Erik as of 4AM CST 10/14/2010
Notice that NOBODY deemed him credible.
He still doesnt have credible INFO of course, but....
After some research prompted to me by Erik, I found that he has a valid reason to believe what he does.
Although its too late for a de-programmer to help him get back to normal, he at least may get something out of what I posted here.
He is a victim of a most whacky religious cult that is named in the following pastes about the NWO.
Below I have provided the proof needed to disprove Chemtrails and how the NWO idea was manipulated to appear that they really seek universal dominance/socialism.
....................
CHEMTRAILS:
.. ..
The chemtrail conspiracy theory began to circulate in 1996 when the United States Air Force (USAF) was accused of "spraying the US population with mysterious substances" from aircraft "generating unusual contrail patterns".[8] The Air Force says these accusations were a hoax fueled in part by citations to a strategy paper drafted within the Air Force's Air University entitled Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025.[12][13] The paper was presented in response to a military directive to outline a future strategic weather modification system for the purpose of maintaining the United States' military dominance in the year 2025, and identified as "fictional representations of future situations/scenarios".[13] The Air Force further clarified the paper "does not reflect current military policy, practice, or capability", and that it is "not conducting any weather modification experiments or programs and has no plans to do so in the future."[8][14] Additionally, the Air Force states that the "'Chemtrail' hoax has been investigated and refuted by many established and accredited universities, scientific organizations, and major media publications.
Proponents of the chemtrail theory say that chemtrails can be distinguished from contrails by their long duration, asserting that the chemtrails are those skytracks that persist for as much as a half day or transform into cirrus-like clouds.[3] However, some contrails are visible for several hours according to Contrails facts, a USAF publication.[8] Air Force officials say that long lasting contrails result from certain atmospheric conditions, and their duration and rate of dissipation can be accurately predicted when humidity level and temperature are known.[8]
According to a United States Air Force contrail fact sheet, contrails, or condensation trails, are "streaks of condensed water vapor created in the air by an airplane or rocket at high altitudes."[8] These condensation trails are the result of normal emissions of water vapor from piston engines and jet engines at high altitudes in which the water vapor condenses into a visible cloud. Contrails are formed when hot humid air from the engines mix with, and are cooled by, the colder surrounding air. (The mixing is a result of turbulence generated by the jet engine exhaust). The rate at which contrails dissipate is entirely dependent upon weather conditions and altitude. If the atmosphere is near saturation, the contrail may exist for some time. Conversely, if the atmosphere is dry, the contrail will dissipate quickly.[8]
Government agencies and experts on atmospheric phenomena deny the existence of chemtrails, asserting that the characteristics attributed to them are simply features of contrails responding differently in diverse conditions in terms of the sunlight, temperature, horizontal and vertical wind shear, and humidity levels present at the aircraft's altitude.[2][7][8][11][21] Experts explain that what appears as patterns such as grids formed by contrails result from increased air traffic traveling through the gridlike United States National Airspace System's north-south and east-west oriented flight lanes, and that it is difficult for observers to judge the differences in altitudes between these contrails from the ground.[8] The jointly published fact sheet produced by NASA, the EPA, the FAA, and NOAA in 2000 in response to alarms over chemtrails details the science of contrail formation, and outlines both the known and potential impacts contrails have on temperature and climate.[24] The USAF produced a fact sheet as well that described these contrail phenomena as observed and analyzed since at least 1953. It also rebutted chemtrail theories more directly by identifying the theories as a hoax and denying the existence of chemtrails.[7][8]
In 2001, United States Congressman Dennis Kucinich introduced legislation that would have permanently prohibited the basing of weapons in space, and he listed chemtrails as one of a number of exotic weapons that would be banned.[25] Proponents have asserted that because explicit reference to chemtrails was entered by Congressman Kucinich into the congressional record, this constitutes official government acknowledgement of their existence.[21][26] That bill received an unfavorable evaluation from the United States Department of Defense and died in committee,[27] with no mention of chemtrails appearing in the text of any of the three subsequent failed attempts by Kucinich to enact a Space Preservation Act.
Proponents of the chemtrail theory say that chemtrails can be distinguished from contrails by their long duration, asserting that the chemtrails are those skytracks that persist for as much as a half day or transform into cirrus-like clouds.[3] However, some contrails are visible for several hours according to Contrails facts, a USAF publication.[8] Air Force officials say that long lasting contrails result from certain atmospheric conditions, and their duration and rate of dissipation can be accurately predicted when humidity level and temperature are known.[8]
According to a United States Air Force contrail fact sheet, contrails, or condensation trails, are "streaks of condensed water vapor created in the air by an airplane or rocket at high altitudes."[8] These condensation trails are the result of normal emissions of water vapor from piston engines and jet engines at high altitudes in which the water vapor condenses into a visible cloud. Contrails are formed when hot humid air from the engines mix with, and are cooled by, the colder surrounding air. (The mixing is a result of turbulence generated by the jet engine exhaust). The rate at which contrails dissipate is entirely dependent upon weather conditions and altitude. If the atmosphere is near saturation, the contrail may exist for some time. Conversely, if the atmosphere is dry, the contrail will dissipate quickly.[8]
Government agencies and experts on atmospheric phenomena deny the existence of chemtrails, asserting that the characteristics attributed to them are simply features of contrails responding differently in diverse conditions in terms of the sunlight, temperature, horizontal and vertical wind shear, and humidity levels present at the aircraft's altitude.[2][7][8][11][21] Experts explain that what appears as patterns such as grids formed by contrails result from increased air traffic traveling through the gridlike United States National Airspace System's north-south and east-west oriented flight lanes, and that it is difficult for observers to judge the differences in altitudes between these contrails from the ground.[8] The jointly published fact sheet produced by NASA, the EPA, the FAA, and NOAA in 2000 in response to alarms over chemtrails details the science of contrail formation, and outlines both the known and potential impacts contrails have on temperature and climate.[24] The USAF produced a fact sheet as well that described these contrail phenomena as observed and analyzed since at least 1953. It also rebutted chemtrail theories more directly by identifying the theories as a hoax and denying the existence of chemtrails.[7][8]
In 2001, United States Congressman Dennis Kucinich introduced legislation that would have permanently prohibited the basing of weapons in space, and he listed chemtrails as one of a number of exotic weapons that would be banned.[25] Proponents have asserted that because explicit reference to chemtrails was entered by Congressman Kucinich into the congressional record, this constitutes official government acknowledgement of their existence.[21][26] That bill received an unfavorable evaluation from the United States Department of Defense and died in committee,[27] with no mention of chemtrails appearing in the text of any of the three subsequent failed attempts by Kucinich to enact a Space Preservation Act.
Posted by Euro on October 14, 2010 - Thursday - 2:19 AM
NEW WORLD ORDER....
------------------------------....
.. ..
Prior to the early 1990s, New World Order conspiracism was limited to two American countercultures, primarily the militantly anti-government right, and secondarily fundamentalist Christians concerned with end-time emergence of the Antichrist.[7] Skeptics, such as Michael Barkun and Chip Berlet, have expressed concern that right-wing populist conspiracy theories about a New World Order have now not only been embraced by many left-wing conspiracy theorists but have seeped into popular culture, thereby inaugurating an unrivaled period of people actively preparing for apocalyptic millenarian scenarios in the United States of the late 20th and early 21st centuries. These political scientists warn that this mass hysteria may not only fuel lone-wolf terrorism but have devastating effects on American political life,[8] such as the far right wooing the far left into joining a revolutionary Third Position movement capable of subverting the established political powers.[3][9]
During the 20th century, many statesmen, such as Woodrow Wilson and Winston Churchill, used the term "new world order" to refer to a new period of history evidencing a dramatic change in world political thought and the balance of power after World War I and World War II. They all saw these periods as opportunities to implement idealisticglobal governance only in the sense of new collective efforts to identify, understand, or address worldwide problems that go beyond the capacity of individual nation-states to solve, while respecting their sovereignty. These proposals led to the creation of international organizations, such as the United Nations and NATO, and international regimes, such as the Bretton Woods system and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, which were calculated both to maintain a balance of power as well as regularize cooperation between nations, in order to achieve a peaceful phase of capitalism. These creations in particular and liberal internationalism in general, however, would always be criticized and opposed by the American Old Right on isolationist grounds and by the New Right on benevolent imperalist grounds.[10] proposals for
During the Red Scare of 1947–1957, conspiracy theorists of the American secular and Christian right increasingly embraced and mongered unfounded fears of Freemasons, Illuminati, and Jews being the driving force behind an "international communist conspiracy". The threat of world communism in the form of a state atheistic and bureaucratic collectivist world government, demonized as a "Red Menace", therefore became the main focus of apocalyptic millenarian conspiracism. The Red Scare would shape one of the core ideas of the political right in the U.S. which is that liberals and progressives with their welfare-state policies and international cooperation programs such as foreign aid unwittingly contribute to a gradual process of collectivism that will inevitably lead to nations being replaced with a communist one-world government.[13]
When President Bush announced his new foreign policy would help build a New World Order, his phrasing surged through the Christian and secular hard right like an electric shock, since the phrase had been used to represent the dreaded collectivist One World Government for decades. Some Christians saw Bush as signaling the End Times betrayal by a world leader. Secular anticommunists saw a bold attempt to smash US sovereignty and impose a tyrannical collectivist system run by the United Nations.[13]
During the 20th century, many statesmen, such as Woodrow Wilson and Winston Churchill, used the term "new world order" to refer to a new period of history evidencing a dramatic change in world political thought and the balance of power after World War I and World War II. They all saw these periods as opportunities to implement idealisticglobal governance only in the sense of new collective efforts to identify, understand, or address worldwide problems that go beyond the capacity of individual nation-states to solve, while respecting their sovereignty. These proposals led to the creation of international organizations, such as the United Nations and NATO, and international regimes, such as the Bretton Woods system and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, which were calculated both to maintain a balance of power as well as regularize cooperation between nations, in order to achieve a peaceful phase of capitalism. These creations in particular and liberal internationalism in general, however, would always be criticized and opposed by the American Old Right on isolationist grounds and by the New Right on benevolent imperalist grounds.[10] proposals for
During the Red Scare of 1947–1957, conspiracy theorists of the American secular and Christian right increasingly embraced and mongered unfounded fears of Freemasons, Illuminati, and Jews being the driving force behind an "international communist conspiracy". The threat of world communism in the form of a state atheistic and bureaucratic collectivist world government, demonized as a "Red Menace", therefore became the main focus of apocalyptic millenarian conspiracism. The Red Scare would shape one of the core ideas of the political right in the U.S. which is that liberals and progressives with their welfare-state policies and international cooperation programs such as foreign aid unwittingly contribute to a gradual process of collectivism that will inevitably lead to nations being replaced with a communist one-world government.[13]
When President Bush announced his new foreign policy would help build a New World Order, his phrasing surged through the Christian and secular hard right like an electric shock, since the phrase had been used to represent the dreaded collectivist One World Government for decades. Some Christians saw Bush as signaling the End Times betrayal by a world leader. Secular anticommunists saw a bold attempt to smash US sovereignty and impose a tyrannical collectivist system run by the United Nations.[13]
For over 2,000 years, apocalyptic millenarian Christian eschatologists have feared a globalist conspiracy as the fulfillment of prophecies about the "end time" in the Bible, specifically in the Book of Ezekiel, the Book of Daniel, the Olivet discourse found in the Synoptic Gospels, and the Book of Revelation. They assert that people who have made a deal with the Devil to gain wealth and power have become pawns in a supernatural chess game to deceive humanity into accepting an utopian world government, which rests on the spiritual foundations of a syncretic-messianic world religion, that will later reveal itself to be a dystopian world empire, which imposes the imperial cult of the Unholy Trinity — Satan, the Antichrist and the False Prophet. In many contemporary Christian conspiracy theories, the False Prophet will either be the last pope of the Catholic Church (groomed and installed by an Alta Vendita or Jesuit conspiracy) or a guru from the New Age movement or even the leader of an elite fundamentalist Christian organization like The Fellowship, while the Antichrist will either be the president of the European Union or the secretary-general of the United Nations or even a Colossus-like supercomputer.[5]
Some of the most vocal critics of end-time conspiracy theories come from within Christianity.[13] In 1993, American historian Bruce Barron wrote a stern rebuke of apocalyptic Christian conspiracism in the Christian Research Journal, when reviewing American televangelist Robertson's 1991 book The New World Order.[26] Another critique can be found in American historian Gregory S. Camp's 1997 book Selling Fear: Conspiracy Theories and End-Times Paranoia,[2] which has been described as "impressive both as a historical and theological work".[13] Camp warns of the "very real danger that Christians could pick up some extra spiritual baggage" by credulously embracing conspiracy theories.[2] Progressive Christians, such as American preacher-theologian Peter J. Gomes, argue that the Bible must be read carefully to avoid misusing the text to legitimize ideological prejudices in the dominant culture.[27] They caution conservative Christians that a "spirit of fear" can distort scripture and history by dangerously combining biblical literalism, apocalyptic timetables, demonization, and oppressive prejudices, such as sexism, homophobia, classism, xenophobia, racism, and antisemitism.[28] They therefore call on Christians who indulge in conspiracism to repent.[29][30]
So now Erik, the mystery is solved.
It is your right wing views that are attached to your religious beliefs (apocalyptic millenarian Christian eschatologists)
that make you believe what you do, along with that crazy ass Global research that ENABLES you to believe its credible, even though none of the people that are a part of that publication are scientific experts...etc...
Youre not crazy after all, you just believe in the WRONG religion that is not much different than the Moonies or the Branch Davidians.
This blog had a purpose after all...it cleared you of being crazy....be happy I investigated.
Posted by Euro on October 14, 2010 - Thursday - 2:45 AM
....
Eriks Trusted Source:....
.. ..
YOU CANT DEBUNK ANY OF MY SOURCES. I JUST USE THEM TO BACK UP EVERYTHING I SAY ON MY BLOGS. THAT MEANS THAT YOU JUST PULLED A FULL ON 360 MORON ON YOURSELF. I CAN BACK UP EVERYTHING I EVER SAID ON MY BLOGS.
HERES ONE OF MY SOURCES...
http://www.globalresearch.ca/
NOW DEBUNK IT...SHOW US ALL IN YOUR PATHETIC ARROGANCE HOW YOU ARE GOING TO DEBUNK GLOBAL RESEARCH SCUMBAG.
CLICK THE LINK AND DEBUNK IT SO WE CAN ALL SEE THAT YOU CAN BACK YOURSELF UP. THE JOKES ON YOU CHUMP.
HERES ONE OF MY SOURCES...
http://www.globalresearch.ca/
NOW DEBUNK IT...SHOW US ALL IN YOUR PATHETIC ARROGANCE HOW YOU ARE GOING TO DEBUNK GLOBAL RESEARCH SCUMBAG.
CLICK THE LINK AND DEBUNK IT SO WE CAN ALL SEE THAT YOU CAN BACK YOURSELF UP. THE JOKES ON YOU CHUMP.
Posted by Erik on October 13, 2010 - Wednesday - 9:44 AM
Ok Erik,
I just KNEW that your source was a looney source as well:
Globalresearch or Centre for Research on Globalisation was founded by Chossudovsky,Michel. One of the most important sources for 911-research since 2001. The Centre for Research on Globalisation (CRG) is an independent research and media group of progressive writers, scholars and activists committed to curbing the tide of "globalisation" and "disarming" the New World Order. Global Research released a print magazine "GlobalOutlook" and promoted articles by Francis Boyle, Greg Palast, Larry Chin, Michael C. Ruppert, Michel Chossudovsky (CRG editor), Fisk,Robert, Mumia Abu-Jamal, Carol Brouillet, Tetrahedron, Haupt,Nico, Scott Ritter, Alex Jones, FAIR, Sunshine Project (Jan v. Aken etc..), Gore Vidal, Stan Goff, Barrie Zwicker, Chaim Kupferberg, Patrick Martin, Paul Thompson, Jacob Levich and many many more. (-->) Therefore Globalresearch is an important tool for investigative newbies. GR analysed interviews with Zbigniew Brzezinski (->), who was described as the "blueprinter" of 911 or basically "inspired the real people behind 911"
Erik, Erik, Erik!!!!
shouldn't tell me your resources because it gets you into trouble!!!
Another whacky guy that believes in 9/11 being an inside job, that the NWO is going for globalization and that they are PROGRESSIVE, ACTIVISTS, and the source is there for NEWBIES.
wow dude, you really buried yourself this time.
UPDATE:
This is for Erik:
YOU BURIED YOURSELF ASSHOLE ...YOU CNN SUCKING HYPOCRITE. YOU BELIEVED THE LIES OFF OF A FUCKING TELEVISION SET LIKE A PRESCHOOLER SUCKING ON A SANTA CAUS GUMMIE BEAR.
JET FUEL CANT MELT STEEL....NO FIRE CAN BRING DOWN A STEEL BUILDING IN 12 SECONDS FLAT. I ALREADY POSTED THE CONTROLLED DEMOLITION, YOU'VE BEEN HAD SUCKER BITCH, YOUR DISINFORMATION IS NULL AND VOID. GO BACK TO DISINFORMANT SCHOOL.
YOU ARE PATHETIC.
JET FUEL CANT MELT STEEL....NO FIRE CAN BRING DOWN A STEEL BUILDING IN 12 SECONDS FLAT. I ALREADY POSTED THE CONTROLLED DEMOLITION, YOU'VE BEEN HAD SUCKER BITCH, YOUR DISINFORMATION IS NULL AND VOID. GO BACK TO DISINFORMANT SCHOOL.
YOU ARE PATHETIC.
Posted by Erik on October 14, 2010 - Thursday - 1:35 PM
"JET FUEL CANT MELT STEEL."
ok, but read this:
I am a junior at an engineering-exclusive school studying materials engineering. I do know enough to explain this situation. The actual maximum burning temperature of a Jet-A fuel (standard jet fuel type in U.S.) is 980 deg. Celsius. If you refer to the Iron-Iron Carbide phase diagram, the temperature at which steel changes from cementite and pearlite (strong phases of steel) to austenite (significantly less strong) is 702.5 deg. Celsius. Also, if a steel structure is exposed to a temperature just below or at the eutectic (702.5 deg.) for a period of time, martinsite is formed (very weak). All it would take is a few I-beams to lose their structural integrity before the "chain reaction" would start. I don't have a strong opinion on the conspiracy theory, but when people say that the heat from burning jet fuel cannot melt steel it bothers me. It doesn't have to "melt" for it to become ineffective. Also, "very strong type of steel" is the most relative statement ever. The steel used in sky scrapers is a standard carbon steel, not heavily alloyed. In any case, the iron-iron carbide phase diagram describes all carbon steels very accurately. Also, when the buildings actually collapsed, all that potential energy was released into heat and sound, which is true for all destructive reactions. So it is quite possible that after the buildings fell, the temperature of the rubble reached levels higher than any fire could produce
ok, but read this:
I am a junior at an engineering-exclusive school studying materials engineering. I do know enough to explain this situation. The actual maximum burning temperature of a Jet-A fuel (standard jet fuel type in U.S.) is 980 deg. Celsius. If you refer to the Iron-Iron Carbide phase diagram, the temperature at which steel changes from cementite and pearlite (strong phases of steel) to austenite (significantly less strong) is 702.5 deg. Celsius. Also, if a steel structure is exposed to a temperature just below or at the eutectic (702.5 deg.) for a period of time, martinsite is formed (very weak). All it would take is a few I-beams to lose their structural integrity before the "chain reaction" would start. I don't have a strong opinion on the conspiracy theory, but when people say that the heat from burning jet fuel cannot melt steel it bothers me. It doesn't have to "melt" for it to become ineffective. Also, "very strong type of steel" is the most relative statement ever. The steel used in sky scrapers is a standard carbon steel, not heavily alloyed. In any case, the iron-iron carbide phase diagram describes all carbon steels very accurately. Also, when the buildings actually collapsed, all that potential energy was released into heat and sound, which is true for all destructive reactions. So it is quite possible that after the buildings fell, the temperature of the rubble reached levels higher than any fire could produce
Posted by Euro on October 14, 2010 - Thursday - 7:32 PM
Also, one of Eriks commenters in his blog had replied to how he admitted getting so angry that he curses a lot at the people who don't believe him and his posts.
She was very articulate and I think he should really listen to what she has to say about self control:
Read more: http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=393931985&blogId=539848380#ixzz12ObICtpl
Also, one of Eriks commenters in his blog had replied to how he admitted getting so angry that he curses a lot at the people who don't believe him and his posts.
She was very articulate and I think he should really listen to what she has to say about self control:
Eric,
I understand completely what you are saying and you are correct, you are being provoked by evil to be sinful with your tongue and your actions to keep you bound and enslaved. I used to talk the same way and get provoked into reacting and being angry. I have learned that anything negative comes from darkness and when you think those thoughts, all you need to do is rebuke the thought and turn to prayer, ask for help from the Most High to walk you through it and HE will.
It does take work, patience and repentance but you will rise above it all if you take action!
I have watched you in the blogs for a long while now and I will say because of your language and anger I did not pay much attention to your message until now. The reason for me listening now? Because much of what you are talking about is the same thing that I am being taught by the Holy Spirit, so I know it is truth!
One must learn to get out the message and if the other party is not willing to hear it,walk away , You have nothing to prove to anyone. I have had people write blogs against what I am writing about in my blogs, I have had my page hacked into and had to delete my last profile. I have been called a heretic, witch, drug addict....well...you get the idea.
But...none of that matters to me, it is all meaningless words. I know the truth and the ONE who created me knows the truth and that is all that matters. I hope some of what I have said will help.
Always be blessed~
Tammie
Posted by Servant of One on Thursday, October 14, 2010 - 8:47 PM
Read more: http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=393931985&blogId=539848380#ixzz12ObICtpl
Read more: http://www.myspace.com/eurodanceaddict2/blog#ixzz12ZOFJmwe
