sab page2

Guy! Michael Rochester	Breeze In the Trees? Is that an illusion to Mother Nature passing wind?   Posted by Michael, "The Situation" Guy! on Saturday, February 13, 2010 - 11:12 AM [Reply to this]

	Breeze In Trees	sure, why not.  funny - i've been wondering when i'd come across the 3% that jumps off with the booringly obvious.  took a couple years, but...hey buddy, you win!   Posted by Breeze In Trees on Sunday, February 14, 2010 - 3:46 PM [Reply to this]

	Michael, "The Situation" Guy! Michael Rochester	I always raise the bar in whatever post I make.   Posted by Michael, "The Situation" Guy! on Sunday, February 14, 2010 - 5:49 PM [Reply to this]

	Sabrina Phillips	.. Thank you for setting the record straight for these goons! The reality is hard for them to face.   Posted by Sabrina Phillips on Friday, February 12, 2010 - 2:14 PM [Reply to this]

	CONSERVATIVE HERO Conservative Hero	You're absolutely right. Not only that but a poll of muslim Americans under the age of 30 found that about 25% believed suicide bombings to be justified. We're constantly accused of racism and intolerance, for simply acknowledging the actions of violent muslims, by those who obtusely ignore the violent to focus on the good. The simple fact of the matter is it's irrelevant that most muslims are "peaceful" because it doesn't change the fact many are not. Contrary to leftist sentiment the solution is not that we simply pretend they don't exist in order to avoid offending the "peaceful" majority. As you said a paltry "minority" of violent muslims is in reality a massive legion; and simply look at what only a handful did on 911. Another reality is most "peaceful" muslims support the implementation of sharia law in the west. Islamic democracy, as evidenced with palestine a few years ago, resulted in the election of hamas (a terrorist group) into power by the "peaceful" muslim majority. I'm afraid it's asking too much to ask S Ryder to grasp any of these things however. She's the typical brainwashed, self-loathing, American socialist who spends all of her time undermining our traditional American/Christian values while defending our most avowed enemies. Like any other socialist she's willing to ignore reality or lie to whatever extent is necessary to portray our culture as no better than any other (even the most conspicuously bad).   Posted by CONSERVATIVE HERO on Friday, February 12, 2010 - 11:38 AM [Reply to this]

	Sabrina Phillips	.."undermining our traditional American/Christian values while defending our most avowed enemies. " and they do it under the banner of "multiculturalism" and "diversity."   Posted by Sabrina Phillips on Friday, February 12, 2010 - 2:16 PM [Reply to this]

	Timothy	She is willing to sacrifice any or all of us for the Brownies badge of being a gooood lib.   Posted by Timothy on Friday, February 12, 2010 - 2:09 PM [Reply to this]

	David David Rooke	You may be right in saying that most muslems are non violent but unfortunately the ones who are violent  seem to have the upper hand,its like russia was before the wall came down,most of them were not communists but the ones holding the reigns were.In any case with Iran having nuclear capability, we all have to be worried   Posted by David on Thursday, February 11, 2010 - 11:22 PM [Reply to this]

	S♥Ryder	And we should stand up to the ones who think being extreme is acceptable, but not punish Islamic people as a whole.   Posted by S♥Ryder on Friday, February 12, 2010 - 1:37 PM [Reply to this]

	Breeze In Trees	what do you think our military campaigns are!!!???    UGH!   Posted by Breeze In Trees on Friday, February 12, 2010 - 2:45 PM [Reply to this]

	Michael, "The Situation" Guy! Michael Rochester	Uhhhh....pretty awesome and rad, dude!   Posted by Michael, "The Situation" Guy! on Saturday, February 13, 2010 - 11:51 AM [Reply to this]

	Breeze In Trees	yes, Michael, that was my point for this Ms. Ryder person - duuuh!    Posted by Breeze In Trees on Sunday, February 14, 2010 - 3:46 PM [Reply to this]

	CONSERVATIVE HERO Conservative Hero	The so called "peaceful" muslims will simply quietly allow, as they do all throughout the middle east, the fanatics who rule them to do as they wish.   Posted by CONSERVATIVE HERO on Friday, February 12, 2010 - 11:38 AM [Reply to this]

	Timothy	Islam is ass backward, period.  I don't hate the race.  I hate the ideology, just as I hate liberal ideology.  They can be friendly just as a liberal is friendly.  The problem is if you let them have what they want, either way, the good country I grew up in will no longer exist.  Westernized, former Islamists I have no problem with.  PS. I'M PROUD TO BE JUDGEMENTAL!   Posted by Timothy on Thursday, February 11, 2010 - 6:16 PM [Reply to this]

	HARRY FOX	Islam is ass backward, period.  I don't hate the race. Posted by Timothy on Friday, February 12, YOU PATHETIC LITTLE MAN. I have waiting for you to make a mistake like that.  People have been watching your bigotted, juvenile, small minded, foul-mouthed, violent comments for a long time, all made while cowering behind an anonymous profile. i suspected you knew fuck-all about this subject. ISLAM IS NOT A RACE, IT'S A RELIGION   Posted by HARRY FOX on Sunday, February 14, 2010 - 11:43 AM [Reply to this]

	Adrian Pfitz Her	..Harry Fox, find your toothbrush yet?   Posted by Adrian on Monday, February 15, 2010 - 1:18 AM [Reply to this]

	Adrian Pfitz Her	..Harry Fox, still missing your toothbrush and your musical skills? Comparing me to Timothy McVeigh is like comparing you to Eric Clapton.   Posted by Adrian on Monday, February 15, 2010 - 1:16 AM [Reply to this]

	S♥Ryder	Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. I'm sorry you are that way, you are no better than anyone else, and have no right to judge them either.   Posted by S♥Ryder on Thursday, February 11, 2010 - 7:27 PM [Reply to this]

	CONSERVATIVE HERO Conservative Hero	Wrong! That is a warning against hypocrisy. It's doesn't say not to judge but rather what one should do prior to judging. Do not judge unless you are prepared to be judged in return (7:1) because whatever standard to which you held the other party will be applied back to you (7:2). What you left out is that he goes on (7:5) to say "first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye." Seriously, just admit you're not a Christian already, as it's plainly obvious. Your comments are literally the same distortions of the Bible in order to sanction licentiousness that I've been hearing for years and years from atheists and perverts. I mean it takes, maybe, 5 seconds of thought to realize what you're suggesting is absolute lunacy. The legal and penal systems must be abolished because S Ryder says no one may be judged in spite of millennia of Christian history to the contrary? I don't think so.   Posted by CONSERVATIVE HERO on Friday, February 12, 2010 - 11:55 AM [Reply to this]

	Sabrina Phillips	..You can judge a tree by its fruit. What kind of fruit does Islam produce?   Posted by Sabrina Phillips on Friday, February 12, 2010 - 2:17 PM [Reply to this]

	Timothy	They kill the fruits they produce . They also produce nuts.... Are nuts, fruits?   Posted by Timothy on Friday, February 12, 2010 - 10:27 PM [Reply to this]

	Moshellie Michelle J.	..Religious views don't 'produce fruit', the intent and actions of people do. I've seen some pretty fruit-less Christians... and  fruit-full Buddhist. That doesn't validate or demonize either, though. I don't judge a person by the theology they chose, but by their character.   Posted by Moshellie on Friday, February 12, 2010 - 2:45 PM [Reply to this]

	Adrian Pfitz Her	..We are at Fucking War with radical islam, and all you can do is say, "oh, waaahhhh Christians can be bad people, too."   Posted by Adrian on Saturday, February 13, 2010 - 3:44 PM [Reply to this]

	Moshellie Michelle J.	..I'm curious of your solution. Carpet bomb 'em? Convert them all to your belief system? Absorb their governments and 'bring them democracy'? Or... isn't this about the time you call me a fattie and tell me how hot Coulter is? ...and to think you are the person commenting above about originality.   Posted by Moshellie on Saturday, February 13, 2010 - 5:13 PM [Reply to this]

	HARRY FOX	..I'm curious of your solution.  Posted by Moshellie on  February 13 Shoot them with your pretty red gun, julie andrews.   Posted by HARRY FOX on Sunday, February 14, 2010 - 11:43 AM [Reply to this]

	Moshellie Michelle J.	..You seem bitter, Harry. No worries, doll.... I don't have a red gun yet. But I'll be sure to post pictures for you when I do , since you're so concerned with it and all. :)   Posted by Moshellie on Monday, February 15, 2010 - 12:20 AM

	Sabrina Phillips	You are abnormally obsessed with people having guns. Have you not heard of some of the atrocities that go on without the use of guns? Some maniac who just got out of a psych ward, I'm sure you can relate, just went nuts on the streets of Las Vegas and axed a 4 month old baby to death and put his mother in the hospital. Are you really this ignorant?   Posted by Sabrina Phillips on Sunday, February 14, 2010 - 3:59 PM

	CONSERVATIVE HERO Conservative Hero	And? That's pertinent to my remark how exactly? She said religious views do not produce fruit. I pointed out that, since they often shape and motivate people and their actions, yes they do.   Posted by CONSERVATIVE HERO on Saturday, February 13, 2010 - 10:09 AM [Reply to this]

	Moshellie Michelle J.	..Considering the fruit you're bearing... I don't imagine you have much room to talk. You use religion to belittle and promote hate toward anything that doesn't align with your moral ideology. I'm curious, why do you even respond to people you assume are so awfully immoral? Is calling them baby killing sluts really something that will make them aware of their faults and change... or do you rant just to pat your own moral back?   Posted by Moshellie on Saturday, February 13, 2010 - 12:00 PM [Reply to this]

	CONSERVATIVE HERO Conservative Hero	Yes, yes, anyone who doesn't tolerate the garbage you do is guilty of "hate;" a standard response of the leftist in lieu of any real argument. Look, Mo, I'm not going to sit and keep explaining the obvious to a person over and over. There's no "assumption" involved on my part. The woman has explicitly expressed her support for and defended infanticide. She IS a baby-killer. The whole crux of your damned stupid argument is that I'm somehow wrong for calling the bitch what she is. According to you I'm, apparently, just supposed to sit here and coddle her while she supports the liquidation of a few million more people. You will forgive me if I do not buy into that deranged idiocy. She also quoted a Biblical verse, in criticism of The Bible, which called for the punishment of whoremongering and/or prostitution. But according to you there's apparently no possible correlation between opposition to the punishment of promiscuity and prostitution and the perpetration of said behavior; that I'm just taking a 'wild leap' by calling her a slut. I'm sure it's just coincidence that queers want all sodomy statutes repealed too, right? Not that they have a vested interest in such.   The woman is too stupid to realize she's a relativist FFS (or apparently what that even is), and that relativism is a staple of marxism; not Christianity (yet she keeps calling herself the latter while espousing a concept of the former). I don't need to hold her hand, and "sha sha" her, and I'm not going to; because it doesn't work. I tried to explain it to her, she was too brainwashed to either grasp it or care, and now I'm done. Screw her. She's a damned relativist moron. You should also dispense with your seeming assumption that I'm here to proselytize. I'm not. As such I don't need to be her "friend."   Posted by CONSERVATIVE HERO on Saturday, February 13, 2010 - 3:45 PM [Reply to this]

	Moshellie Michelle J.	..Ok, i'm genuinely curious. After reading that, I have to wonder why you respond to her at all? If you think her beyond the ability to 'think', then why do you go on about her being an slutty evil commie bitch? What is your aim by trying to degrade her? If you have no interest in someone's opinion, and have no sense you may be able to engage in a meaningful discussion... why bother with a reply at all? There must be something in it for you, no?   Posted by Moshellie on Saturday, February 13, 2010 - 5:15 PM

	EurodanceAddict	Conservative Hero, 1. "According to you I'm, apparently, just supposed to sit here and coddle her while she supports the liquidation of a few million more people" 2. "You should also dispense with your seeming assumption that I'm here to proselytize. I'm not." Line 2 is contradictory to line 1   Posted by EurodanceAddict on Saturday, February 13, 2010 - 5:03 PM

	S♥Ryder	"Hero" makes him/herself feel better and more important by putting me and others down.   Posted by S♥Ryder on Saturday, February 13, 2010 - 1:31 PM [Reply to this]

	CONSERVATIVE HERO Conservative Hero	Why is it this nonsense is all you jackasses can ever produce? I've never claimed to be "better" than anyone per se. Clearly you think I am as you're the only one who keeps suggesting it. That I point out you're a baby-hating hatemonger who supports the murder of children doesn't mean I have a superiority complex; it just means you're baby-hating lowlife. Besides, the entire premise of your response is asinine anyway. I am better than quite a lot of people, such as: pedophiles, rapists, necrophiliacs, homos, bank robbers, shoplifters, those pervert foot-fetish guys, people who rip pages out of phone books at public phones, coprophiliacs... oh wait, I already said that one (homos), zoophiles, george tiller, pretty much anyone with a paraphilia of any sort as there are too many too list, the French, probably the vast majority of lawyers and politicians, terrorists, people who leave the toilet seat up, prostitutes, all of the democrat leadership, gang members, people who double dip their potato chips, girls (at video games anyway), michael moore, all the midgits who don't have their own TV shows, etc., etc., etc. I mean, I could go on forever.   Posted by CONSERVATIVE HERO on Monday, February 15, 2010 - 12:26 AM

	CONSERVATIVE HERO Conservative Hero	And people and actions are often motivated by their religious views, so yes they do.   Posted by CONSERVATIVE HERO on Friday, February 12, 2010 - 7:33 PM [Reply to this]

	Moshellie Michelle J.	..To an extent. I think people are taking personal responsibility out of the equation and blaming a book for the hate harbored by some of the followers. I'm not a fan of the Qur'an, but I have seen many Muslims that don't take it to the fundamentalist level. It's not as easy as just 'get rid of Islam and you'd get rid of terrorism'. It's a cultural divide, not just a religious difference.   Posted by Moshellie on Saturday, February 13, 2010 - 10:09 AM [Reply to this]

	Timothy	The more religious the Muslim, the more likely they are to blow themselves up in a Jewish pizza parlor..... The more religious the Christian, the more likely they are to risk their lives and deny simple pleasures to help people they don't even know.   Posted by Timothy on Saturday, February 13, 2010 - 10:32 AM [Reply to this]

	Michael, "The Situation" Guy! Michael Rochester	Moshellie, Fred Phelps' followers number about 100 people or less. They are not even equal to the population of a large office.   Posted by Michael, "The Situation" Guy! on Sunday, February 14, 2010 - 5:49 PM

	S♥Ryder	So you and "Hero" must not be very religious then. Makes sense!   Posted by S♥Ryder on Saturday, February 13, 2010 - 1:31 PM

	Moshellie Michelle J.	..Yea? Tell that to Fred Phelps and the abortion bombers. They are solid in their faith, to the point of executing it via hate mongering.   Posted by Moshellie on Saturday, February 13, 2010 - 11:51 AM

	S♥Ryder	Not all, they also have moral view which aren't always religious.   Posted by S♥Ryder on Friday, February 12, 2010 - 9:48 PM [Reply to this]

	Timothy	Thanks Hero.  Ryder is just vomiting the same ol horse shit that she heard from her hippy parents.   Posted by Timothy on Friday, February 12, 2010 - 2:09 PM [Reply to this]

	CONSERVATIVE HERO Conservative Hero	What is virtually always the response an immoral person has when you judge them for doing something wrong? They cite any flaw of yours they can find in an attempt to descend you down to their level; to portray you as no better. (If they can't find a legitimate flaw to cite, they often wildly embellish the most trivial things to a farcical extent; such as you being "impolite," for example, as "proof" you're just as bad as they are. If that doesn't work they'll simply fabricate a flaw for you; such as claiming you're guilty of "hate.") Regardless, it must be understood that this is casuistry aimed at sanctioning immorality by very indirectly asserting that two wrongs make a right. Go back and look at the posts of S Ryder and you'll see she utilizes this very same casuistry against Christianity and America. They ceaselessly highlight our flaws, while apologizing for those of our enemies, and constantly work to condescend us down to their level and portray us as "equal" with, or "no better" than, other faiths/cultures/etc. The fact however, as evidenced by the unrivaled levels of liberty and prosperity created here, is that we are better; or at least we were (as this is changing thanks to the moronic left's success in forcing us to emulate the rest of the world). And if we're ethnocentric, so what? Most countries are (even crappy ones). American exceptionalism has always been a point of patriotic pride. The only ones who take issue with this are self-loathing democrats who want us to abandon American excellence and adopt the socialist mediocrity of the rest of the world; because our excellence hurts their "self-esteem" or some sh*t. It was Christianity that gave us everything they have here, but just look at how these ingrate slugs are always tearing it down, and instead espousing the virtue of everyone, anyone, else. It's enough to gag a ****in maggot.   Posted by CONSERVATIVE HERO on Saturday, February 13, 2010 - 10:10 AM [Reply to this]

	Hamish Hamish Stewart	I totally agree and that is why Obama will not get through his health care changes and so much of his political agenda. This is a bit off post and I hate doing that, but take health care, in New Zealand it is socialised and apparently we spend per capita 60% what America spends Obama sees a figure like that and thinks it will work in America it won't. I am technically a subject of Elizabeth II not a citizen of New Zealand I own my house only by permission of the Queen (Fee Simple mind you if she tried to take it back she would be out off a job  ) The bottom line is we are a lot more comfortable with government interference in our lives than Americans. To use another health example the experts tell us we are more efficient due mainly to insurance OK we have ACC ( Accident compensation ) if you cripple me I can't sue you that right has been extinguished the State is liable we fund this by a tax on employers. I pay 38 cents in the dollar in tax and every product and service produced by our economy is taxed a further 12.5 %. By definition it is a socialist system, back to health every one is guaranteed health care but elective surgery (not life threatening ) tends to have waiting lists, waiting 2 years to get your tonsils out would be politically unacceptable in the USA in New Zealand we accept it. To achieve his objectives Obama has to change  American psychcology, the tea party ? movement described by one commentator as an 18 century political movement aimed at achieving a 19th century society using 21 century methods is what Obama is up against, he has to convince you to give up freedom, he is in effect saying the revolution was a mistake. Freedom is to a certain degree a myth but it is one that all Americans sign up to and the myth becomes a reality. It is what makes America so great you will die on your feet rather than living on your knees, if I bump into the Queen I am expected to bow and I would. I have stated else where on this thread that Americas dedication to the ideal of freedom saw them defend my country and Australia in WWII thousands of Americans died doing that. Another comment I remember is that America isn't here to police the world if America won't who will ? America has a proud tradition of standing up to thugs like Ahmadinajad. I have looked at Ryder's posts and I agree ( although I am an athiest ) but your flaws are not important when compared to the moral leadership you can provide. Ryder has lost confidence in America I, and I can hear you my friend " a fucking socialist in the South Pacific " have not. LOL. Random questions Ryder why is your profile set to private ? Are you so scared that we will read your blog and hold you accountable for your silly ideas ?   Posted by Hamish on Sunday, February 14, 2010 - 2:55 AM [Reply to this]

	CONSERVATIVE HERO Conservative Hero	That has always been another thing that greatly annoyed me. They continuously cite our flaws but never cite our tremendous contributions to the world. It's common to hear leftists here tear down Christianity ceaselessly, and espouse the virtues of buddhists, for example, but on their best day buddhists never kung fu fought their way through nazi lines to save the world from the reich like American Christians. No one has given greater fortunes of their wealth to aid the suffering and oppressed than Americans. Yet no matter what we do the bastards always b*tch about what is left undone.   Posted by CONSERVATIVE HERO on Sunday, February 14, 2010 - 11:44 AM [Reply to this]

	S♥Ryder	My profile is private because I talk to my real friends there. I don't blog there. I never said I lost faith in America. I point out the other side of the argument that people aren't thinking about, even if I myself don't personally agree with it. I am able to look at the other side with some perspective and see it for what it really is, it's not automatically "bad" or "wrong" because I don't agree with it, while it can be. However it is misunderstood in some cases   Posted by S♥Ryder on Sunday, February 14, 2010 - 11:42 AM [Reply to this]

	CONSERVATIVE HERO Conservative Hero	Your answer is found by not truncating the statement you quoted.   Posted by CONSERVATIVE HERO on Saturday, February 13, 2010 - 6:52 PM [Reply to this]

	EurodanceAddict	Hero, "The fact however, as evidenced by the unrivaled levels of liberty and prosperity created here, is that we are better;" define "better" If you are claiming we have more right to live than other people from other countries, you are dead wrong.   Posted by EurodanceAddict on Saturday, February 13, 2010 - 5:04 PM [Reply to this]

	Sabrina Phillips	We are the land of the free. We don't live under a tyranny or dictatorship. We are also industrially and technologically advanced. It's people like you who take our freedom for granted that make me sick.   Posted by Sabrina Phillips on Sunday, February 14, 2010 - 4:02 PM [Reply to this]

EurodanceAddict

Sabrina, "We are the land of the free. We don't live under a tyranny or dictatorship. We are also industrially and technologically advanced. It's people like you who take our freedom for granted that make me sick. " First line has NOTHING to do with us having more right to LIVE than other countries and it also doesn't make US "better". Second line makes us better in "conveniences" but not as more of a right to live. How am I taking freedom for granted? in fact I bask in freedom since I don't go by a book that is antiquidated and outdated.   Posted by EurodanceAddict on Sunday, February 14, 2010 - 5:29 PM [Reply to this]