Current mood:
aggravatedCategory: Blogging
"you can't stay away from drama?
Lika Pika on July 20,"
And you think friending sad lisa guarantees a drama free existence, do you lika.
What would your sexual abuse organistion ,the name of which eludes me, make of sad lisa forcing someone's child hood abuse into the open to blackmail someone? As seen on vanna's blog in march
And you think friending sad lisa guarantees a drama free existence, do you lika.
What would your sexual abuse organistion ,the name of which eludes me, make of sad lisa forcing someone's child hood abuse into the open to blackmail someone? As seen on vanna's blog in march
Posted by Harry Fox on Monday, July 19, 2010 - 10:29 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Harry, what is your obvious problem? I was good to you. Forget it now.
Please learn to spell properly if you're going to try to threaten anything. Report me if you wish, I dare you.
Harry: Yes, organistation, your founder is friends with someone I hate.
Organization: What is the problem with this person?
Harry: She picks on me on myspace.
Ridiculous, isn't it?
Please learn to spell properly if you're going to try to threaten anything. Report me if you wish, I dare you.
Harry: Yes, organistation, your founder is friends with someone I hate.
Organization: What is the problem with this person?
Harry: She picks on me on myspace.
Ridiculous, isn't it?
Posted by Lika Pika on Tuesday, July 20, 2010 - 2:53 AM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Uh, you and euro tried to press changers on her a while back for pickin on you !!
Posted by S on Tuesday, July 20, 2010 - 1:38 PM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nice try, but no cigar. Charges were never pressed nor even thought of for what ever it was that we WERE arguing about.
Posted by Lika Pika on Wednesday, July 21, 2010 - 1:12 AM
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nice sidestepping of the issue, Lika! 
I believe Harry's question was "Why is the head of an organization that is supposed to be protecting children CONSTANTLY defending someone who thinks nothing of emotionally blackmailing a person by exposing their email talking about their molestation as a child... all just to shut someone up on the internet?"
Seems like a legitimate question to me.
Please answer it. We all REAAAAAALLY wanna know.
I believe Harry's question was "Why is the head of an organization that is supposed to be protecting children CONSTANTLY defending someone who thinks nothing of emotionally blackmailing a person by exposing their email talking about their molestation as a child... all just to shut someone up on the internet?"
Seems like a legitimate question to me.
Please answer it. We all REAAAAAALLY wanna know.
Posted by EricBrooks.Com® on Tuesday, July 20, 2010 - 12:42 PM
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric, is that YOUR question? Or are you trying to redirect Harry's diatribe?
1) Lisa is on my friends list, yes, but does not need my constant defense. She does well enough on her own.
2) I defend her as a mother for doing what she thought she needed to do for her daughter, whom was a CHILD at the time of the crime.
3) I publicly opposed the tactic of Lisa using someone else's childhood sex abuse to exploit on the internet.
4) The person in question to keep quiet engages in sexually harassing women on the internet, uses ad-hominem insults as a legitimate way to argue, and I could make a list long enough to blog about it...
5) As the founder of an organization, I do defend children constantly. This is my PERSONAL page, to where this speaks of MY PERSONAL opinion, not that of the organization.
Problems? Obviously you do. Say what you mean, if you don't mind.
1) Lisa is on my friends list, yes, but does not need my constant defense. She does well enough on her own.
2) I defend her as a mother for doing what she thought she needed to do for her daughter, whom was a CHILD at the time of the crime.
3) I publicly opposed the tactic of Lisa using someone else's childhood sex abuse to exploit on the internet.
4) The person in question to keep quiet engages in sexually harassing women on the internet, uses ad-hominem insults as a legitimate way to argue, and I could make a list long enough to blog about it...
5) As the founder of an organization, I do defend children constantly. This is my PERSONAL page, to where this speaks of MY PERSONAL opinion, not that of the organization.
Problems? Obviously you do. Say what you mean, if you don't mind.
Posted by Lika Pika on Wednesday, July 21, 2010 - 1:20 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"3) I publicly opposed the tactic of Lisa using someone else's childhood sex abuse to exploit on the internet."
This has been answered to my satisfaction.
Thank you.
This has been answered to my satisfaction.
Thank you.
Posted by EricBrooks.Com® on Wednesday, July 21, 2010 - 1:27 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"She picks on me on myspace.
Ridiculous, isn't it?
Ridiculous, isn't it?
Lika Pika on July 20"
and on oshay and on s. phillips and mtrg and cheryl b and her late husband
Did you say one single word of criticism to sad lisa about the use of someone's childhood trauma to
blackmail mtrg?
Anything at all?
It was chaos and carnage between dec and april and it disrupted the lives of so many people
You're a stupid selfish bitch
and on oshay and on s. phillips and mtrg and cheryl b and her late husband
Did you say one single word of criticism to sad lisa about the use of someone's childhood trauma to
blackmail mtrg?
Anything at all?
It was chaos and carnage between dec and april and it disrupted the lives of so many people
You're a stupid selfish bitch
Posted by Harry Fox on Tuesday, July 20, 2010 - 8:19 AM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If memory serves me correctly, Sir Harry, Mrs. Phillips & Oshay have made their peace with her, so that argument is invalid. You also must condone male to female sexual harassment, or you wouldn't concern yourself with MtRG. Cheryl is no more innocent than anyone else.
And yes, Harry, as a matter of fact, I DID say that, IN PUBLIC (in at least two blogs), more than once, and in a private email to Lisa.
You have very selective memory, Harry, and it seems you only remember what you wish to remember. You are actually one of the most selfish people I've EVER encountered.
And yes, Harry, as a matter of fact, I DID say that, IN PUBLIC (in at least two blogs), more than once, and in a private email to Lisa.
You have very selective memory, Harry, and it seems you only remember what you wish to remember. You are actually one of the most selfish people I've EVER encountered.
Posted by Lika Pika on Wednesday, July 21, 2010 - 1:51 AM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok, now I will make this concise and clear so even the SLOW people can understand:
1. The lawsuit that Lika and I were going to file against Badlisa for calling Lika's Cause (YVI) a fraud, never even made it to consultation.
A. "Reaper of Souls" who used to be aligned with YVI was in charge of Aprils Law Myspace page and had added anti-YVI pics and literature due to his falling out with Lika, and this imagery on that page, convinced Badlisa that we were a fraud.
Lil Deb (Deb Rowbury) owns the page and Reaper should not have been allowed to do her page like that.
2. After reviewing the laws about Libel, it was clear that Badlisa was cleared of any wrongdoing in a defense that is called "Public concern".
This means that as a concerned citizen, she is protected against Libel when making an accusation against a business or organization that is for public benefit, if she has REASON to believe there is something not legal.
3. Both Lika and myself did say openly in Harry's blog a LONG time ago, that we both believed Badlisa should not have used Sabrina's past as leverage against MTRG.
If Harry could hold on to his profiles long enough, he would have been able to backtrack and find those comments.
4. At the time this all happened with Sabrina, she had called and talked to our connection Robin Vos, who was to help get Aprils Law passed, telling him that we were a fraud and may have been the reason he wouldn't agree to meet us this year.
Fortunately, we have 2 other politicians on board.
Therefore, although we didn't by obligation have to say anything to protect Sabrina. We did anyway.
She admitted she would call when we had our last battle in Hardcase's blog.
Why should YVI protect Sabrina when it was she who was trying to close YVI down?
Especially when that affects ALL of the OTHER children who may be helped by YVI?
She should feel good about the whole thing because we kept to our integrity about still protecting her even when she served to destroy Aprils Law in Wisconsin.
5. Speaking for myself, I will be friends with Badlisa for as long as I so desire and I don't care what ANYBODY says!!!
6. I see a lot of people acting like Children just from the fact she has returned.
7. we are not deputized nor a part of any law enforcement agency, so stop acting like we are.
When Lika is under her OWN profile, she is representing HERSELF, NOT YVI.
8. People who run child advocacy causes are NOT celibate or required to be sexless, or keep quiet about sex in general, whether it be leisure or especially, professional (clinical).
Those idiots that have a problem with our sexually expressing ourselves need to get an education and leave the prerequisite rules to the pros.
9. we are NOT bound by any rules to protect EVERYBODY that is being sexually harassed.
If this were the case, there are many we couldn't possibly have time to get to, because it happens a lot on many pages/blogs. Our silence does NOT mean we agree with the abuse...ok HARRY?!!!
Read more: http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=381231937&blogId=537364969#ixzz0uIwqJGOA
No comments:
Post a Comment